WHY SOUTHERN GERMANY HAS
​DECLARED WAR ON BURQAS AND MUSLIMS

By Catherine Davis | 7.9.17
Commentator, Chief Editor, L&SS

Picture

BAVARIA, Germany’s conservative Catholic state of Bavaria is pushing ahead with a ban on the full Islamic face veil, set to come into effect from August 1. The state's parliament approved the ban Thursday. Coming soon before September’s German election, and after controversial bans on Islamic clothing in other European nations, the ban has already sparked debate.

Here’s what you need to know. What does the ban cover?

The ruling is a regional policy, enforced in Bavaria, a southern state which is politically more right-wing than most of Germany.

After the end of July, public servants will be banned from wearing face veils in the state including the burqa, which covers all of the face, and the niqab, which leaves the eyes uncovered. The veils will also be banned from educational institutions, and from polling stations.

Why is this happening?

The Bavarian law states that it is important for society that people are able to see each others’ faces. Face-to-face contact “forms the basis of our interpersonal coexistence, and is the basis of our society and of the free democratic order,” it says. In this, it follows a resolution adopted earlier this year by the pan-European conservative European People’s Party, which said: “seeing one another’s faces is an integral part of human interaction in Europe.”

But there is a political context to this as well. Angela Merkel’s Christian Democratic Union (CDU) party, and its sister party the Christian Social Union (CSU), which runs Bavaria at state level, are both center-right groups conscious of the electoral threat from the hard-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party. The AfD promises a full ban on the burqa as well as on other public expressions of the Islamic faith, such as minarets; the party has capitalized on opposition to the arrival of more than a million refugees, many of them Muslims, into Germany since 2015. But the AfD, which is miles from government, doesn’t have to worry about practicalities. Germany’s constitution contains sweeping protections for the freedom of religion, and a full ban on face veils—like the one France instituted in 2011—would probably be deemed unconstitutional. Instead, the CDU has pledged to explore options for partial bans, like the one Bavaria is now instituting.

Will it be effective?

That all depends on what effect you’re talking about. Politically, the CDU and CSU’s attempts to meet the AfD halfway on issues like security, migration and Islam have paid off. The hard-right party has sunk in opinion polls from almost 15 percent support for much of last year to generally below 10 percent support now.

Bavaria, Bavaria, Bavaria, do you really think that in crouching on your citizen's human rights is going turn out well for your state. less off your country? World History dictates no to this question. That's correct, history has shown that the more restraints imposed on free citizens, the more those citizens rebelled against those laws. 

On the other hand, I most certainly do empathize with Germany and all other countries dealing with a surge in terrorist attacks, which unfortunately for the majority of Muslims who are peaceful, they are all considered suspected of being capable of wearing bombs under their clothing; there isn't any way to distinguish the difference between the two types of Muslims. So, should authorities go with their individual gut instincts and guess whether a hijab wearing young woman is carrying a bomb? 

One could argue the same for non-Muslim 'terrorist' who wear suspicious clothing - if you will. For example, what about people who wear back packs? I guess I should only mention the people here in the US, because I live here, who've attacked and even killed people they thought were Muslim. Should we now ban back packs? We have already banned back packs in certain places such as the Boston Marathon because of the terrorist attack in 2013 that killed three people and injured 260 others. 

For the life of me, I can't understand why any country would have to worry about its fully vetted refugees becoming radicalized and turning into terrorist! 

Read the full Newsweek article... 

_______________________________________________________

Similar Story...

Recommended For You

Uber founder Travis Kalanick resigns ​as CEO amid a shareholder revolt

​Polygamous sect leader Lyle Jeffs was captured after one year pending trial on food stamp fraud charges

Dad tells daughter 'you're dead to me' for going to prom with black man

Survivors of San Diego shooting believe gunman targeted black people; police doubtful

​KKK plans Donald Trump 'victory' parade in North Carolina 
__________________________________________________________
​ProCon.org - Official Site
www.procon.org Pros and cons of controversial issues. Read pro and con arguments for and against topics such as medical marijuana, euthanasia, prostitution, gun control, and more

  1. Social Networking ProCon.org
  2. Social networking sites spread information faster than any other media. Over 50% of people learn about breaking news on social media. 65% of traditional media ...

^